jump to navigation

Socio Economic Classes(‘SEC’ categories) October 15, 2006

Posted by kk in Retail Classroom, Retail Data/ Facts, Retail Knowledge, Retail Resources.
add a comment

IRS_Logo Almost every research report on media, marketing and consumer economics refers to SEC categories. These categories are important because they help in effectively segmenting markets and targeting relevant communication to core consumers for products and services.

Words like SEC A and SEC B are freely tossed around without realising that, barring a few experts, there is little, if any, knowledge about their real meaning. Very few, for example, may be aware that shopkeepers/ traders though affluent and, therefore, having more spending power than most executives would fail to make the ‘high’ grade, if they are not well educated.

Although, MRUC & Hansa Research have come up with a new concept of “Household Potential Index (HPI),” based on the data being regularly collected by IRS, to reclassify consumers, SEC continues to remain universally referenced classification of consuming classes. While, a detailed postings on HPI will soon follow, we explain below the basis of classification of different SEC categories and their relative importance in relation to marketing/ retailing potential:

The socioeconomic classification (SEC) groups urban Indian households on the basis of education and occupation of the chief wage earner (CWE: the person who contributes the most to the household expenses) of the household into five segments (SEC A, SEC B, SEC C, SEC D and SEC E households in that order). This classification is more stable than one based on income alone and being reflective of lifestyle is more relevant to the examination of consumption behaviour. Here, ‘high’ socioeconomic classes refers to SEC A&B, ‘mid’ socioeconomic class refers to SEC C and ‘low’ socioeconomic classes refers to SEC D&E. Data sourced from Indian Readership Survey (*IRS 1998-1999) gives the education and occupation profile of the chief wage earner of households.

The CWEs of nearly half the SEC A households work in executive positions. The other half comprises mainly of industrialist/businessmen or shop owners. Almost all of them are either graduates or post graduates. CWEs of SEC B households are primarily employed at clerical or supervisory levels (46%). 29% are shopkeepers while 10% are industrialist/businessmen. Less than half are graduates or post graduates (45%). 38% are educated till the 10th or 12th grade, while 13% have had some college education. (* IRS 1998-1999 refers to IRS round, July 98-May 99)

The mid socioeconomic class (SEC C) comprises households whose CWEs are employed at clerical or supervisory levels (37%), skilled workers (33%), petty traders (12%) or shop owners (18%). Three quarters of them are educated till the 10th or 12th grade while the rest have attended school till a maximum of the 9th grade. Less than half the CWEs of households belonging to the low socioeconomic classes (SEC D&E) are unskilled workers. About 28% are skilled
workers while 18% are petty traders. 45% have attended school till a maximum of the 9th grade and 31% are illiterate.

Table below shows the socioeconomic classification of urban Indian households. The high socioeconomic classes, i.e. SEC A&B, constitute over a quarter of the urban Indian population. The mid economic class, SEC C constitutes 21% of the population while the lower two SECs account for over half the population.

According to data sourced from the Indian Readership Survey (IRS 1998-1999), urban households have increased their average monthly household income (MHI) by 2.1 to 2.3 times between 1990 and 1999. The increase in average MHI has been higher in the low socioeconomic classes (SEC D&E which account for over 50% of the urban households), i.e. about 14 percentage points more than the percentage increase in average MHI of the higher socioeconomic classes (SEC A&B) as shown in Table. This suggests that improvement in the standard of living has not benefited only the ‘haves’.

TABLE: Socio-Economic Classes

IRS (1998-99) %

NRS (1990-91) & IRS(1998-990)

% increase in avg. MHI

Projected Base: All Urban Households (in 000s):

49174

SEC A 10 113
SEC B 18

113

SEC C 21 117
SEC D & E 51 127

It may be observed from the above that:

  • Households belonging to the mid and low socioeconomic classes (SEC C, D &E) are becoming relevant target groups as they constitute more than 70% of urban households.
  • In the last decade they have grown in economic power.
  • This suggests that households in the mid (SEC C) and low (SEC D&E) socioeconomic classes are segments that can no longer be ignored marketers/ retailers should consider these segments more closely as potential source of growth.

Mall Mania: Adding 117 millionn sq. ft. by 2008 October 10, 2006

Posted by kk in Retail Data/ Facts, Retail News.
add a comment

ebonycgarhHere are some facts emerging on frentic pace at which new mall construction is taking place across the country, particularly in smaller tier II and tier III towns. According to summary of Knight Frank Research report as published by DNA Money:

  • 361 new malls are under construction in diffent cities and towns; 227 of which are being constructed in top seven cities, while the balance 134 are being constructed in 50 small tier II and tier III towns.
  • All the malls are expected to be completed by 2008.
  • Total new space under construction: 117.4 mn. sq. ft.; 76 mn. sq. ft. or 65% of the total would be in top seven cities and the balance 117.4 sq. ft. or 35% of the total would be in 50 small tier II and tier III towns.
  • NCR (National Capital Region) would account for 22% of the total new space, while Mumbai will contribute 15%. The balance 28% of the total would come up in rest of the seven top cities.
  • Distribution of new space in smaller towns is going to be quite lopsided: North region would take lion’s share of 52% with West region accounting for 26% of the new space. Soth region and East region would account for 16% and 6% only.

Reacting to spreading of mall culture to smaller towns, Arvind K Singhal, Chairman of management consultancy Technopack, said:

“Till now, lack of planning has marred Indian cities – they just haven’t been able to fulfill the growing demands of a rising economy and population. Naturally malls are popping up all over to fulfill these demands.”